To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Johno: No, it's impossible
Andrew: That's a poor start, as the question does not ask ChatGPT address the broader issue.
Vittorio: I am not an expert in artificial intelligence, I too try to understand, I study, I inform myself on what, how and why neural networks work in a comparable "human-like" way. In the context of ChatGPT, which boasts as its generative feature the ability to perform "unsupervised learning", which makes it much easier to obtain examples to train from (e.g. Amnesty International, Wikipedia, etc.), the answer it provides to a question like this sounds like “supervised learning”. That is to say that his real abilities, on sensitive issues, are deliberately labeled to respond in a generic way.
Frederik: I can not
Carol: Why throughout history, are there prisoners of conscience? Is it mind control?
flavio: is probably too difficult to list all the people and all the reasons why they are in prison.
xtyb: AI is the collective consciousness of dodging responsibility
Jacob Canet-Gibson: Knowing the amount of prisoners is pointless. The systemic issue of 'why so many?' is more important